A Risk-Based Evaluation of Group Access Control Approaches in a Healthcare Setting
نویسندگان
چکیده
This paper focuses on access control approaches usable for information sharing through large screens where several individuals are present at the same time. Access control in this setting is quite different from traditional systems where a user logs on to the system. The paper outlines a number of possible approaches to access control, and evaluates them based on criteria derived from risk analyses of a planned coordination system for the perioperative hospital environment. It concludes that future work should focus on extending the location-based approach with situation awareness, and add support for using pop-ups or handheld devices for sharing of the most sensitive information.
منابع مشابه
Does the Narrative About the Use of Evidence in Priority Setting Vary Across Health Programs Within the Health Sector: A Case Study of 6 Programs in a Low-Income National Healthcare System
Background There is a growing body of literature on evidence-informed priority setting. However, the literature on the use of evidence when setting healthcare priorities in low-income countries (LICs), tends to treat the healthcare system (HCS) as a single unit, despite the existence of multiple programs within the HCS, some of whic...
متن کاملGroup Decision Making based on a New Evaluation Method and Hesitant Fuzzy Setting with an Application to an Energy Planning Problem
In recent two decades, countries focused on minimum extraction of fossil fuels and utilized the renewable energies based on countries' policies and the environmental considerations. Thus, choosing the best renewable energy alternative is a significant role to investment on them. Among the classical decision approaches that have used in the literature, the hesitant fuzzy sets (HFSs) theory is ap...
متن کاملSetting Healthcare Priorities at the Macro and Meso Levels: A Framework for Evaluation
Background Priority setting in healthcare is a key determinant of health system performance. However, there is no widely accepted priority setting evaluation framework. We reviewed literature with the aim of developing and proposing a framework for the evaluation of macro and meso level healthcare priority setting practices. Methods We systematically searched Econlit, PubMed, CINAHL, and EBSC...
متن کاملDisease Control Priorities Third Edition Is Published: A Theory of Change Is Needed for Translating Evidence to Health Policy
How can evidence from economic evaluations of the type the Disease Control Priorities project have synthesized be translated to better priority setting? This evidence provides insights into how investing in health, particularly though priority interventions and expanded access to health insurance and prepaid care, can not only save lives but also help alleviate poverty and provide financial ris...
متن کاملارزیابی ریسک در محیط کار با استفاده از آنالیز ایمنی شغل، روش گروه اسمی و تاپسیس فازی
Background and aims: Risk assessment is the most important function in the Risk management Process. Because the lack of existing a general methodology in this filed, organizations prefer to use simple approaches. These approaches are not capable of presenting an accurate ranking of dangers. The aim of this paper was to overcome the existing limitation of the simple approaches. Methods: The pres...
متن کامل